A modified version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGs) was administered by telephone to adults, age 18 and above, residing in households throughout the state. The random sample was weighted by age, race and sex. The weighted total number of interviews was 3,395. In order to be asked the questions on the screen, a respondent must have reported. The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) is compared in reliability to a modified version of the Diagnostic Interview for Gambling Severity (DIGS-S) for use as a.
To examine the prevalence of problem gambling and its relationship to other risk-taking behaviors, the authors surveyed 1.350 undergraduates at the 4 campuses of Connecticut State University (CSU) during fall 2000. On the basis of a modified version of the South Oaks Gambling Screen, a widely used screening instrument, they found that 18% of the men and 4% of the women reported they gambling had led to at least 3 negative life consequences (eg, felt guilty, gambled more than intended), commonly defined as problem gambling. Students identified as problem gamblers, compared with other students, were significantly more likely to be heavy drinkers, report negative consequences of alcohol consumption, and be regular tobacco and marijuana users. Problem gambling was related to binge eating and greater use of weight-control efforts. University athletes were also found to have significantly greater problem gambling rates than nonathletes. The majority of students gambled but experienced few of the negative consequences reported by problem gamblers.
Keywords: binge eating, college students, gambling, risk-taking, heavy drinking, South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS)
Modified South Oaks Gambling Screen High
- Abbott, M. & Volberg, R. (1991).Gambling and problem gambling in New Zealand. Research Series #12, Research Unit, Department of Internal Affairs, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
- Abbott, M. & Volberg, R. (1992).Frequent gamblers and problem gamblers in New Zealand: Report on phase two of the national survey. Research Series #14, Research Unit, Department of Internal Affairs, Wellington, New Zealand.Google Scholar
- Blume, S.B. (1989). Treatment for the addictions in a psychiatric setting.British Journal of Addiction, 84, 727–729.Google Scholar
- Culleton, R.P. (1989). The prevalence rates of pathological gambling: A look at methods.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 5, 22–41.Google Scholar
- Dickerson, M. & Hinchy, J. (1988). The prevalence of excessive and pathological gambling in Australia.Journal of Gambling Behavior, 4, 135–151.Google Scholar
- Dickerson, M. (in press). A preliminary exploration of a two-stage methodology in the assessment of the extent and degree of gambling-related problems in the Australian population. In W.R. Eadington, J. Cornelius & J.I. Taber (Eds.)Gambling behavior and problem gambling. Reno, Nevada: Institute for the Study of Gambling and Commercial Gaming, University of Nevada, Reno.Google Scholar
- Ladouceur, R. (1991). Prevalence estimates of pathological gamblers in Quebec.Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 36, 732–734.Google Scholar
- Laundergan, J.C., Shaefer, J.M., & Eckhoff, K.F. (1990).Adult survey of Minnesota gambling behavior: A benchmark, 1990. Center for Addiction Studies, University of Minnesota, Duluth.Google Scholar
- Lesieur, H.R. & Blume, S.B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (The SOGS): A new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers.American Journal of Psychiatry 144, 1184–1188.Google Scholar
- Lesieur, H.R. & Blume, S.B. (1990). Characteristics of gamblers identified among patients on a psychiatric admissions service.Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 41, 1009–1012.Google Scholar
- Lesieur, H.R. & Blume, S.B. (1991). Evaluation of patients treated for pathological gambling in a combined alcohol, substance abuse and pathological gambling treatment unit using the addiction severity index.British Journal of Addictions, 86, 1017–1028.Google Scholar
- Lesieur, H.R., Cross, J., Frank, M., Welch, M., White, C.M., Rubenstein, G., Moseley, K. & Mark, M. (1991). Gambling and pathological gambling among university students.Addictive Behaviors: An International Journal, 16, 517–527.Google Scholar
- Lesieur, H.R. & Heineman, M. (1988). Pathological gambling among youthful multiple substance abusers in a therapeutic community.British Journal of Addiction, 83, 765–771.Google Scholar
- Martinez-Pina, A., de Parga, J.L.G., Vallverdu, R.F., Planas, X.S., Mateo, M.M. & Aguado, V.M. (1991). The Catalonia survey: Personality and intelligence structure in a sample of compulsive gamblers.Journal of Gambling Studies, 7, 275–300.Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, R.J. (1989). Pathological gambling and problem gambling: Problems of definition and diagnosis. In H.J. Shaffer, S.A. Stein, B. Gambino & T.N. Cummings (Eds.)Compulsive gambling: Theory, research and practice. (pp. 101–125). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
- Volberg, R. & Banks, S.M. (1990). A review of two measures of pathological gambling in the United States.Journal of Gambling Studies, 6, 153–163.Google Scholar
- Volberg, R. & Steadman, H. (1988). Refining prevalence estimates of pathological gambling.American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 502–505.Google Scholar
- Volberg, R. & Steadman, H. (1989a). Prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in New Jersey and Maryland.American Journal of Psychiatry, 146, 1618–1619.Google Scholar
- Volberg, R. & Steadman, H. (1989b).Problem gambling in Iowa. Report prepared for the Iowa Department of Human Services.Google Scholar
- Wallisch, L.S. (1993).Gambling in Texas: 1992 Texas survey of adult gambling behavior. Austin, Texas: Texas Commission on Alcohol and Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
- Winters, K.C., Stinchfield, R. & Fulkerson, J. (1990).Adolescent survey of gambling behavior in Minnesota: A benchmark. Center for Addiction Studies, University of Minnesota, Duluth.Google Scholar
South Oaks Gambling Screen Scoring
Accordingly, the modified South Oaks Gambling Screen was adopted as the measure of problem gambling behaviour in this research. The mSogs questions are set out at Question 8 of the survey set out in Appendix G. 6.1 Interpreting modified South Oaks Gambling Screen scores Scoring the. SOUTH OAKS GAMBLING SCREEN – RA (REVISED FOR ADOLESCENTS) R. New no deposit bonus codes for rtg casinos. Stinchfield, K.Winters. In the past 12 months, has anyone criticized your betting or told you that you had a gambling problem, regardless of whether you thought it was true or not? Last modified. The aim of this study is to assess the extent and characteristics of gambling among dental students. Three hundred sixteen dental students enrolled at a private midwestern dental school accessed the twenty-six-item modified South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS) as an online survey.